<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Should Have Gone With Cisco</title>
	<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com</link>
	<description>Everything under the Cisco sun</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nexus 7000 NX-OS upgrade by Brian Shimkus</title>
		<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/02/20/nexus-7000-nx-os-upgrade/#comment-31041</link>
		<author>Brian Shimkus</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/02/20/nexus-7000-nx-os-upgrade/#comment-31041</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for this information!  It made upgrading our MDS 9148's to the latest NX-OS a breeze!

bks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for this information!  It made upgrading our MDS 9148&#8217;s to the latest NX-OS a breeze!</p>
<p>bks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cisco Virtual Switching Systems (VSS) by Juno</title>
		<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/03/09/cisco-virtual-switching-systems-vss/#comment-12490</link>
		<author>Juno</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/03/09/cisco-virtual-switching-systems-vss/#comment-12490</guid>
		<description>I have an operation 6509 chassis with a SUP 720 and WS-X6708-10GE module. I have just added a second 6509 with the same characteristics. My intention is to go with VSS. I added one link from the SUP and one link from the Module from both 6509. I am about to configure the vss but firstly i wanted to make sure that this setup is ok and working. If someone has some previous experience please post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an operation 6509 chassis with a SUP 720 and WS-X6708-10GE module. I have just added a second 6509 with the same characteristics. My intention is to go with VSS. I added one link from the SUP and one link from the Module from both 6509. I am about to configure the vss but firstly i wanted to make sure that this setup is ok and working. If someone has some previous experience please post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Integrating the Nexus 1000v VSM with vCenter by Manish Chacko</title>
		<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/08/10/integrating-the-nexus-1000v-vsm-with-vcenter/#comment-12322</link>
		<author>Manish Chacko</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/08/10/integrating-the-nexus-1000v-vsm-with-vcenter/#comment-12322</guid>
		<description>Dude, Long time. Working with Vmotion-that's awesome-I was a big fan of VMware the 3.5 years at netQoS, but I never got to play with the enterprise stuff-vmotion, esx, vsphere, etc. Only free vmware server, player and workstation.
Anyways, good blog-you should consider R&#38;D and writing for a university or large firm like IBM-that wya you will never be bored :).
Sent u a message on linkedin
Regards,
Manish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, Long time. Working with Vmotion-that&#8217;s awesome-I was a big fan of VMware the 3.5 years at netQoS, but I never got to play with the enterprise stuff-vmotion, esx, vsphere, etc. Only free vmware server, player and workstation.<br />
Anyways, good blog-you should consider R&amp;D and writing for a university or large firm like IBM-that wya you will never be bored :).<br />
Sent u a message on linkedin<br />
Regards,<br />
Manish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Integrating the Nexus 1000v VSM with vCenter by Matt</title>
		<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/08/10/integrating-the-nexus-1000v-vsm-with-vcenter/#comment-11971</link>
		<author>Matt</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/08/10/integrating-the-nexus-1000v-vsm-with-vcenter/#comment-11971</guid>
		<description>It seems you haven't blogged in a while, this is one of the better blogs out there for this product.

Please please keep going !!!

thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems you haven&#8217;t blogged in a while, this is one of the better blogs out there for this product.</p>
<p>Please please keep going !!!</p>
<p>thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Book Review - ExamCram CCNA Voice by Ted Trentler</title>
		<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/02/18/book-review-examcram-ccna-voice/#comment-11743</link>
		<author>Ted Trentler</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/02/18/book-review-examcram-ccna-voice/#comment-11743</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great review.  As a technical reviewer for the book, I'm really glad you had so few gripes with it.

To comment a bit on the QOS section . . .
The Cisco authorized learning material for the IUC course only really covers the basics of QOS theory and Auto QOS configuration.  

Glad you enjoyed it.  

Ted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great review.  As a technical reviewer for the book, I&#8217;m really glad you had so few gripes with it.</p>
<p>To comment a bit on the QOS section . . .<br />
The Cisco authorized learning material for the IUC course only really covers the basics of QOS theory and Auto QOS configuration.  </p>
<p>Glad you enjoyed it.  </p>
<p>Ted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

