<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Should Have Gone With Cisco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com</link>
	<description>Everything under the Cisco sun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nexus 7000 NX-OS upgrade by kgabo Moleofe</title>
		<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/02/20/nexus-7000-nx-os-upgrade/#comment-50734</link>
		<dc:creator>kgabo Moleofe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/02/20/nexus-7000-nx-os-upgrade/#comment-50734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank for the infor. how would you do a nondisruptive  upgrade on Nexus 7000 with duel processors active and standby through console port. I have to do this upgrade but is realised that this complitely deferent from the way we upgrade normal switch or router.

Please help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank for the infor. how would you do a nondisruptive  upgrade on Nexus 7000 with duel processors active and standby through console port. I have to do this upgrade but is realised that this complitely deferent from the way we upgrade normal switch or router.</p>
<p>Please help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cisco Virtual Switching Systems (VSS) by Scott Vieth</title>
		<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/03/09/cisco-virtual-switching-systems-vss/#comment-45498</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Vieth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/03/09/cisco-virtual-switching-systems-vss/#comment-45498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If you choose to use the 16 port line cards for VSL links, there are some caveats. First, you have to be running the module in performance mode, meaning it now becomes an 8 port card (no over subscription of ports for VSL).&quot;

1. If you change the entire WS-X6716-10GE to performance mode, it turns into a 4 port card:

no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription

2. If you change just port group 4 [ports 13-16] to performance mode, it turns into a 13 port card:

no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription port-group 4

3. If you change two port groups to performance mode, it turns into a 9 port card:

no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription port-group 4
no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription port-group 3

4. If you change three port groups to performance mode, it turns into a 5 port card

no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription port-group 4
no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription port-group 3
no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription port-group 2

5. Changing all four of the port groups to performance mode one-at-a-time is the same as changing the whole card with one command (you end up with a four-port 10Gig card).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you choose to use the 16 port line cards for VSL links, there are some caveats. First, you have to be running the module in performance mode, meaning it now becomes an 8 port card (no over subscription of ports for VSL).&#8221;</p>
<p>1. If you change the entire WS-X6716-10GE to performance mode, it turns into a 4 port card:</p>
<p>no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription</p>
<p>2. If you change just port group 4 [ports 13-16] to performance mode, it turns into a 13 port card:</p>
<p>no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription port-group 4</p>
<p>3. If you change two port groups to performance mode, it turns into a 9 port card:</p>
<p>no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription port-group 4<br />
no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription port-group 3</p>
<p>4. If you change three port groups to performance mode, it turns into a 5 port card</p>
<p>no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription port-group 4<br />
no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription port-group 3<br />
no hw-module switch 1 slot 4 oversubscription port-group 2</p>
<p>5. Changing all four of the port groups to performance mode one-at-a-time is the same as changing the whole card with one command (you end up with a four-port 10Gig card).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Routing Challenge by Irshad</title>
		<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/01/29/routing-challenge/#comment-37706</link>
		<dc:creator>Irshad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 05:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/01/29/routing-challenge/#comment-37706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ted,

What about setting MED ? Router B advertises the default route with MED 50 and Router A sets MED 100. So the PE conneting Router D will prefer to send the traffic to Router B, right?

Irshad]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted,</p>
<p>What about setting MED ? Router B advertises the default route with MED 50 and Router A sets MED 100. So the PE conneting Router D will prefer to send the traffic to Router B, right?</p>
<p>Irshad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q&amp;A &#8211; VSS and Jumbo Frames by Mike</title>
		<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/04/28/qa-vss-and-jumbo-frames/#comment-36119</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/04/28/qa-vss-and-jumbo-frames/#comment-36119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yea, i opened a TAC case about seeing Giants on some MPLS interfaces we have. It turns out, a Giant is anything over the 1500 MTU so even if you increase the MTU on the interface config, that doesnt change the counter behavior. Nice post!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, i opened a TAC case about seeing Giants on some MPLS interfaces we have. It turns out, a Giant is anything over the 1500 MTU so even if you increase the MTU on the interface config, that doesnt change the counter behavior. Nice post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nexus 7000 NX-OS upgrade by Brian Shimkus</title>
		<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/02/20/nexus-7000-nx-os-upgrade/#comment-31041</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Shimkus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/02/20/nexus-7000-nx-os-upgrade/#comment-31041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks so much for this information!  It made upgrading our MDS 9148&#039;s to the latest NX-OS a breeze!

bks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for this information!  It made upgrading our MDS 9148&#8242;s to the latest NX-OS a breeze!</p>
<p>bks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
